
Introduction
Knee replacement surgery has become one of the most common and successful orthopedic procedures worldwide. For patients suffering from severe knee pain due to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or traumatic injuries, two main options are available: Total Knee Replacement (TKA) and Partial Knee Replacement (UKA, also called Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty).
Although both involve the implantation of a knee prosthesis, their scope, surgical techniques, recovery times, and long-term outcomes differ significantly. Understanding these differences can help patients and surgeons make the most appropriate choice.
In Total Knee Replacement, the damaged cartilage and bone from all three compartments of the knee joint (medial, lateral, and patellofemoral) are removed. An artificial prosthesis made of metal and polyethylene components replaces the entire joint surface.
In Partial Knee Replacement, only the damaged part of the knee (usually the medial compartment) is replaced with a smaller prosthesis, while the healthy bone, cartilage, and ligaments remain intact.
Feature | Total Knee Replacement (TKA) | Partial Knee Replacement (UKA) |
Surgical Scope | Entire knee joint | Single compartment only |
Implant Size | Larger prosthesis | Smaller prosthesis |
Bone Preservation | More bone removed | More natural bone preserved |
Recovery | Longer rehabilitation | Faster recovery, less pain |
Indications | Severe arthritis, deformity | Early-stage arthritis, localized damage |
Longevity | 15–20 years | 10–15 years (may convert to TKA later) |
Advantages of TKA
Advantages of UKA
Limitations
Conclusion
Both Total Knee Replacement and Partial Knee Replacement are proven solutions for knee arthritis, but their suitability depends on the extent of joint damage and patient condition.
When choosing between the two, patients should consult with their orthopedic surgeon, considering factors like age, activity level, and overall knee health.